|
|
Currently no members online:)
You are an anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here |
We have 64 guests online !
|
|
|
|
|
Feature: Alternatives to Pickets |
Posted by
Devin on Sunday, June 02, 2002 - 04:02 AM PST
Most of you are aware of my distaste for the ideal of the typical monogamous "True Love" relationship and Nuclear family. Because I'm always having to explain my living situation to people who just don't get it, my roommate and I are always venting about how people would be a lot happier if they would expand some of their definitions a little bit. We've been having a lot of these conversations lately, so I figured it was about time to write down some examples of other stuff that works for those that have been complaining about their relationships not working, but not thinking about what it would take to make them work.
I've been wondering since high school why there's not more words for relationships. You've got friends, fuckbuddies, lovers, girl/boyfriends, spouses, and all of the family words. If you're lucky enuf to be from hawaii, you've also got ohana and the family words that don't necessarily mean blood family. Aside from that you pretty much have to recycle those words and explain yourself for days to make the other person understand where you stand.
Sisters:
The reason this came up in high school is that I didn't really consider the first girl I slept with to be my girlfriend. She was one of my best friends for sure, but I thought of her more as my sister, except that we had sex all the time (and no it was not weird). Most people thought we were an item, and I'll admit it did look that way at first look. At that age I don't think people have enuf communication skills to have normal polyamourous relationships (I certainly didn't), and we were constantly trying (with varying success) to set each other up with our friends. That's not something high school sweethearts generally do from what I've seen. We weren't fuckbuddies tho - we were inseperable, and way more cozy than a normal fuckbuddy thing.
Projects:
A while back I did a project with a schizophrenic crackhead. She was the girl who's full name nobody knew but if you said "Lithium Michelle" everyone on the island knew exactly who you were talking about. I usually call stuff like that projects - but reccently I've gotten some sneers for explaining it like that. I think the sneers come from people who have tried to do projects and have had them fail hurtfully. I don't do projects unless I know they'll work. I've watched friends (mostly girls) take a messed up junkie boy and think they can fix him and they always end up getting trampled. Successful projects are a whole different thing, and incredibly satisfying - even if they do take a lot of energy. Not that I'm recommending going and finding a crazy of your own, but if you know you can do it and how you're going to do it, and you know it'll work AND you know you have the energy to finish what you started - I'd highly recommend it. I spent a few months with this girl and we learned a LOT from each other. It's really amazing what you can learn from someone who has no concept of reality. I'm sure the public perception was that we were dating, but basically I was her shrink (and her student). I'm glad I don't have a license or I'd be in jail (and not just for sleeping with her), but after years of licensed shrinks she was still a mess when I got her, and now she's doing good. I'm still not sure what to call that kind of relationship, since project doesn't really work. Maybe someone has an idea.
GothyBaby:
A few years later, I found a street brat and adopted her. She was up here visiting me a few weeks ago and kind of got this thought process going again. I just call her my GothyBaby since there's really no other word that works at all. I think of her as my little girl, except that we have sex sometimes, and always sleep nekkid and pressed closer together than I can sleep with anyone else. And no, it doesn't seem weird in the least. I remember when I first found her, I wasn't sure what I was going to do, so I found someone I didn't know and explained everything to them and asked what to do. They said they didn't know, it sounded like a lot of work, but if I did keep her, she was going to love me more than anyone else ever, and they told me not to decide lightly cuz it wouldn't be the high school "GothyBaby and Devin 4 eva", it would really be literally forever. It seems they were absolutely right. She's living in California now with her awesome girlfriend and is completely happy and getting to be really fuckin cool :)
Best Friend:
For those of you that want a more standard relationship, with the appearance of normalcy, and the shacking up and all that - might I recommend the Best Friend. I placed an order while I was out on one of my Mom's (another subject entirely) porches, smoking too many cigarettes and talking about life. She asked me for all of the details about what I wanted and made suggestions for the stuff I didn't know. I said my next girlfriend was going to be a Saggittarius Redhead who looked a little like Tori Amos but not exactly, and that she was going to be fun and share good, and be classy and punky and about the coolest person anyone I know had ever met (among other things). I figured if I was ordering my perfect girl, I might as well not hold anything back. I figured it was a pretty tall order so when mom told me to forget the conversation, I did. Then a week later I met her. She bounced up and said hi to the little blonde friend I was with, and the first words I ever said to her were "I love you too, what's your name?" A few weeks later, I saw her at a club and when it was closing, she said she was gonna take me home with her and fuck me. We didn't get around to having sex for a few days, but we were instantly best friends, and ended up living together for about 2 years (starting that night). All of our friends were jealous that we had the perfect relationship, but couldn't understand why we slept with other people. They didn't really think maybe that was why it was so perfect. See, when I was placing my order, I forgot 2 things (maybe because I was talking to a mom). I forgot to mention that she should be my type, and that we would have really good sex. She was certainly delicious, but not really my type - and the sex was fun and friendly and very cozy, but we both knew we'd had better. So instead of doing the expected thing and breaking up so we could find yummiers, we just stayed together and found yummiers anyway. We used to say just because we had our cake and were eating it too, there was no reason not to have sprinkles. Anyone who's ever dated a Saggittarius girl can probably understand their need for variety, and well... leo boys.... duh... She's still my one of my best friends, and I expect she always will be. How many of your exes can you say that about?
Wife:
Back to my current living situation, this is what has me thinking about this stuff enuf to write all of this. The girl I live with is by all appearances, my wife. We joke about the fact that she cleans the house, spends my money, does my laundry, cooks, cleans my house - and doesn't have sex with me. That's right, unlike all of the other girls on this page, I have no intention of ever having sex with her. She's certainly delicious (although not quite my type), but that's just not the vibe. We thought about actually getting married once but the tax benefeits ended up not being as good as we thought they were. My work has "domestic partner benefeits" though, and due to the whimpy conservative way they're worded (corporate speak for 'gay lover' where they don't actally say that you're having sex with the person), she fits the definition enuf to be considered my "domestic partner". We usually use the word roommate to explain it (unless we're joking, then she's my wife), but that word doesn't really work since we're way more cozy than that. We don't share a bed, we don't cuddle, we don't even get naked around each other, but we're certainly way more cozy than roommates. She probably understands me better than anyone else, she's the only person that understands EXACTLY what kind of girls I like, and she's psychic enuf to know what I need and make sure I get it without having to ask. Roommate also implies that the person pays rent, but we've never even talked about it. And yes, it's fair.
I have a bunch more examples I was going to write, but these all got longer than I was expecting. I think that's enuf tho to show that you can define your relationships however they'll work, and you don't have to try and make them into what other people think they should be. I've never seen a "happily ever after" romance work well, but I haven't had to bitch to a friend about the person I'm with in about 10 years. My relationships seem to be much happier than the ones around me, and they all tend to last forever if I want them to. Funny how the "Happily ever after" ones don't seem to do that. Someone told me once when we were talking about this that either 2 billion people were wrong or I was wrong. At this point it would take a lot to convince me that there is a right way for relationships to be and that I'm not doing it, so apparently 2 billion people CAN be wrong. If anyone would like to try and convince me otherwise, I've had that conversation about a half a million times at this point. The wall's right there, I even chalked an X on it where you should bang your head. I hope this helps someone realize that there's other ways to do stuff, and you don't have to complain about your signifigant others if you're willing to be as eccentric as you like to think you are.
|
|
| |
|
|
Average Rating : 5.0
Total ratings : 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatives to Pickets | Login/Create an account | 32 Comments |
| Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
Re: Alternatives to Pickets
by MorteAscendo on Jun 02, 2002 - 05:07 AM
(User info | Send a Message)
http://
|
Devin, do you have a machine that could take me back a few years and i'd could live your life for awhile. Shit, the last 7 years of my life have been stuck in a drug, computer hacking haze that brought me to the military. Hee hee...just say that im a tad jealous.
|
Charlton Heston?
by Dolorosa on Jun 02, 2002 - 06:16 AM
(User info | Send a Message)
|
I'm going to have to alter my normal definitions of things for awhile...it might make my life that much easier. In light of recent personal events, Devin...your words enlighten as always. Perhaps I don't need to reevaluate myself, so much as I need to change my volcabulary yah?
Mad props for the way you think.
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Alternatives to Pickets
by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com)
on Jun 02, 2002 - 09:40 AM
(User info | Send a Message)
http://www.plynlymon.com
|
Brothers (for me at least) give you cumfy sex when you arent in the mood to go out and then eat ice cream with you afters and tell you that yes, those pants do make you look fat.
Boyfriends are the ones that you pretend to date so that your friends wont figure out that you are actually spending your time with a girl.
Husbands are something to be avoided at all costs, but hubbies are something to be treasured. you share living costs, chores, and toys with hubbies. you divorced husbands.
There are also lovers, those people that you dont see that often and dont have a deep friendship with. instead you have great chemestry and dreamy sex with them. they are a retreat from the yuckiness of everyday life where you both get your egos regrown and come away with shakey legs and a big grin.
lets not forget good friends that you have slept with in the past and probably will sleep with again, have no hangups about being naked in front of, and ogle thier , um, the people that they may or may not be having sex with.
there are people that you can share sex with, or share intimacy with, or words, or secrets, or fun, or one of a thousand other things. and each "type" of relationship is different and unique and perfect in itself. Each one is necessary to being a whole person.
sex does not make a relationship, nor does a relationship mean sex. and just 'cause there is sex and snuggles and all that yummy stuff doesnt mean that its all the sex or snuggles or yummy stuff that you need/want from just one person. that is waaay too much pressure to put on someone you care about, them having to be the fulfillment of all your dreams, needs, wants, desires, whims, hopes, and all the various social pressures and models that we deal with everyday.
|
Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Anonymous-Coward on Jun 02, 2002 - 08:03 PM | Yes, yes, yes, to everything you and Devin have said... I always called the friends I could call on at a moment's notice my "boys", they would be there for me if anyone was picking on me, or I needed comfort. There were my fuckbuddies... friends I would hang out with sometimes, but have sex with them more often than not, just for the pleasure of blowing off some steam. There were my "brothers" those I was closer to than my "boys" or fuckbuddies, these were ones that I feel very close to even now, I would walk through fire for them, and they'd do the same for me. There were the "boyfriends", when I was younger, and not poly, my boyfriend in high school was a guy I considered to be my very best friend in the whole world, we were inseparable, we hung out together, played together, talked together, and sex was just another thing we did together... until he decided to have girlfriends behind my back, and the trusting bond was broken... I looked all over for another relationship like that one, without the dishonesty, and didn't find it until I met Rogue. That was pretty much word for word Devin's description under Best Friend, with only minor details off... (Rogue took a walk and wished for the perfect girl, and when he found me, he realized I was it, only I had a kid, then he realized that he hadn't specified whether or not she should have kids) So now we have each other, and are cool with whatever makes the other happy. My friends were so weirded out when they found out about our relationship, my girl-friends would hit on him, jokingly, and then when called on it, would say, "oh, but you don't know what she's like, she'd KILL me if I even looked at you funny" It took me actually throwing him at them for them to understand that I'd changed my outlook on things, and I wouldn't mind. Most of my outlook change was the fact that he's absolutely trustable, and when the rules of our relationship were laid down, we only had one... don't leave. I am secure in the knowledge that I won't be left alone, and so is he... I still have my "boys" and I play with the occasional girl, and he sows his oats, and once in a while, we run across someone we both like, and try to add them to the family... (hasn't worked yet, but we still hope to have more people with us with whom we can feel as close with as we do to each other) I think the point I am trying to make here is, I have, and can have, any and all kinds of love I can come into contact with, which is a good thing, cause you can never have enough love. It's one of those things that is so elusive at best, and when you do find someone who you enjoy, and have deep feelings for, it's silly to throw that away because you have one already. Happiness is too important to be dictated by social mores, and if being able to freely love anyone you can makes you happy, do it. Don't worry about what the standard rules of loving are, make your own rules of loving. It's much better that way, and if you're completely honest with others and yourself, it's a very easy and satisfying way of life. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Meranda_Jade (Meranda@mymind.com) on Jun 02, 2002 - 08:08 PM (User info | Send a Message) | That was me, Meranda_Jade, for some reason the login didn't work, trust me, I'm not an anonymous coward.... :-) |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by ComteStGermain on Jun 13, 2002 - 09:50 AM (User info | Send a Message) | In order to worry about standards, you would need to first establish what were the standards. So far as I know, there are no standards beyond that of the local mores and dogma for the community in which you are playing out said love. If you travel then, or if you do not identify yourself with your community, there are already no standards and you must use your own judgment. You sound like an intelligent woman to me, so you must have taken all of this into account when you wrote your message. One question I have is thus: What makes the difference between a couple who share each other as you have described and a couple who are not strongly attached to each other and so share by default, not capable of being stirred to concern about what their legal partner is doing with his or her time? |
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by ComteStGermain on Jun 14, 2002 - 07:54 AM (User info | Send a Message) | Offense? Quite to the contrary, I am rather flattered. Are you typically so emotionally sensitive to writing styles, or am I priveleged enough to be a rare exception? Returning to the subject at hand, I see that my question has not been addressed as of yet, a question which was valid and perfectly understandable I might add.
Oh, and thank you, it's very nice to meet you as well. The pleasure is, apparently, all mine. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Devin (devin-at-vibechild-dot-com) on Jun 14, 2002 - 09:54 AM (User info | Send a Message) http://devin.vibechild.com/ | You're a rare exception.
And to answer your elementary question, the difference is liking each other enuf to talk and keep agreements.
My question is: Why do people talk before they have something to say? |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Rogue (Rogue@skew.org) on Jun 14, 2002 - 10:32 AM (User info | Send a Message) | Ooh! Ooh! Mister Kotter, I know this one! Is it, to keep people from noticing that they have nothing to say? |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Monolycus on Jun 15, 2002 - 11:56 PM (User info | Send a Message) | If your viscera is anything like my viscera, it could be because his writing style makes one think immediately about the "pseudo-intellectual fuckwit" forum. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Psychopixi (psyche.at.psychopixi.dot.com) on Jul 18, 2003 - 07:13 AM (User info | Send a Message) http://psychopixi.com | *laughs* Thank you for saying that Devin. I just read StGermain's comments and physically shuddered. (I realise this comment is kinda late, but I only just read this article.) |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Meranda_Jade (Meranda@mymind.com) on Jun 14, 2002 - 11:34 AM (User info | Send a Message) | The difference is that we stay together. If two people aren't strongly attached to one another, it's likely that they won't hang around for very long. If two people are strongly attached, and are interested in each others' happiness, to the point that nothing in the world can be denied to one another, even other partners, and can still share their deepest concerns with one another, and just plain enjoy being around one another, that's closer to what I'm talking about. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Rogue (Rogue@skew.org) on Jun 14, 2002 - 11:47 AM (User info | Send a Message) | All I can add to this is the idea that two people giving works out much better than two people taking. Most people seem to be obsessed with taking what they deserve out of relationships, jobs, etc, and it's all very self-centered and selfish in my opinion but these people seem to get most of what they want. On the other hand, if two people give to each other they are still both getting what they want (and more) but it is stuff that is freely given instead of taken by force. It's difficult to explain adequately, but it works better and everyone is more happy that way.
As a veteran of three marriages, I can speak on this from firsthand experience. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Alternatives to Pickets
by VampCourt (Morbidchic@hotmail.com)
on Jun 02, 2002 - 11:17 AM
(User info | Send a Message)
http://www.geocities.com/vampcourt/index.html?1017202482720
|
i think you (devin and cal) have very good points. everyone does have thier own ideas on what makes a reasonable sex life/relationship. some people cant even handle doin the muliple person thing.. some people cant even deal with one person.. but.. its nice to see that there is people in this world who are sane and <i>can</i> handle such. :) You guys should meet my Poly Friend amy. her views are much like yours.. :)
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: =(
by necromancer on Jun 02, 2002 - 12:27 PM
(User info | Send a Message)
http://www.angelfire.com/goth/raina_dillon
|
*sigh* wish more people thought like that; i've had similar things in the past and was never sure what to call them... still don't have a label for my fav relationship of all time with two bi men.
anyway, as far as this thing goes that i'm in now, i guess you could call it a 'project', in a different sort of way
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Alternatives to Pickets
by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com)
on Jun 02, 2002 - 01:41 PM
(User info | Send a Message)
http://www.plynlymon.com
|
http://angeleschapter.org/gls/amusing/poly.htm
kinda a nice list of things to avoid if you want a warm bed and a warmer heart
|
Re: Alternatives to Pickets
by Schizo on Jun 03, 2002 - 04:48 AM
(User info | Send a Message)
|
All this stuff of course depends on a lot of trust. It would be difficult for me and the B.F. to let each other play, because of the trust issues. But we have been talking about three-somes recently! I don't think we're ready for it yet (I don't think I'm in a position to do ANYTHING yet!), but eventually, I'm open to the idea. Just not with the psycho-slut!
I think the B.F. kind of fits under 2 categories now, with a 3rd potential. He's my best friend (now that he's got his head straightened out a bit) and my project (which is why I never really gave up on him, even with his head all fucked up), and now it seems he could end up filling the hubby slot (the kid helps with that). We're keeping it monogamous for now. I think things are complicated enough without bringing in more people at this point! But when things settle down, and the trust issue is taken care of, I can definitely see how other people could add a lot of fun and spice to our lives!
We'll see - I don't want to force things just because I agree with something in theory. Just because I'm open to something doesn't mean I have to do it if it doesn't work naturally. And there seems to be a low percentage of truly yummy people in my area. Bummer.
|
Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Rogue (Rogue@skew.org) on Jun 14, 2002 - 08:40 AM (User info | Send a Message) | The answer of course is that you need to bring your yummy self to where there are people you yum on (is that a word?)...or invite the yum to come over the hills and far away to see you.
We need a convention or something. Think we could rent that big building in Salt Lake City from the Mormons? It has possibilities, and I think it has been a long time since Moroni partied. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Schizo on Jun 15, 2002 - 04:30 AM (User info | Send a Message) | Now that's an idea - don't the Mormon's have a rich heritage of sharing? Of course, all one-sided, but we're a trifle more enlightened, aren't we? |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Alternatives to Pickets
by Ianthe99 on Jun 03, 2002 - 01:55 PM
(User info | Send a Message)
|
It's really too bad more people don't think this way. It might cut out *some* of the nasty jelousy that seems to go with mono relationships. The only true mono relationship I ever had was in H.S... lasted for 8 years on and off. Only problem was.. he kept finding other things he liked.. either cheating on me, or dumping me. I always felt bad if I was attracted to another guy. It's so much nicer to be *allowed* to look at others.. flirt, or whatever.. with honesty.
The lifestyle seems to take some figuring out tho. It sucks when it's a lot easier for one partner to find "playtoys" then the other. I'm really starting to dislike the term "fuckbuddy" too...seems to mean, "I'll sleep with you , but I don't want to talk to you, hang out with you or anything else"..*sigh*.
|
Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Rogue (Rogue@skew.org) on Jun 04, 2002 - 04:18 PM (User info | Send a Message) | Hey, I wanna hang out with you, go to Outlands, get a better look at the inkwork, and so on, it's not all carnal urges... *gives the sensitive guy look* |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by ComteStGermain on Jun 14, 2002 - 07:58 AM (User info | Send a Message) | How very kind of you to be so selfless and genuine. So tell me, does being so transparent prove to be troublesome in your daily life, being mistaken for windows or gusts of wind? |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Rogue (Rogue@skew.org) on Jun 14, 2002 - 10:58 AM (User info | Send a Message) | Actually I get mistaken for a dark shadowy place, like a hole in the universe. That, and occasionally people that bother me end up mistaking me for an open can of whoopass. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Meranda_Jade (Meranda@mymind.com) on Jun 14, 2002 - 12:13 PM (User info | Send a Message) | Comte,
Rogue and I know Ianthe IRL, I've been friends with her for years. Ianthe knows he's saying what he means, and is genuine.. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternatives to Pickets by Schizo on Jun 15, 2002 - 04:38 AM (User info | Send a Message) | How very kind of you to be so abrasive and critical. So tell me, does being so unpleasant prove to be troublesome in your daily life, being mistaken for razor wires or compost heaps? |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: Alternatives to Pickets
by Ianthe99 on Jun 19, 2002 - 01:00 PM
(User info | Send a Message)
|
Yeah.. I knew how to take Rogue's comment.. the lol above *should* have wound up under his comment. Even if I had never spoken to him before, it was kind of obvious he was joking.. and only a closed-minded uptight twit would have gotten offended. Oh.. waitaminute... *wink*
|
|
|