|
|
Re: Messianic Existentialism
by IamSquid (undisclosedgettheaddressfrommeepersonally)
on Dec 24, 2002 - 06:48 PM
(User info | Send a Message)
http://
|
With the exceptioon of the word "messiah" (two words: "mes" an Egyptian word meaning "begotten" such as Ramses: "Ra Mes" or roughly: "Son of Ra" hieroglyph being the pose of Harpocrates and the name and also the name of Moses; and "yah," a title of God; the point being that the word is a Hebrew hand-mee-down from Ancient Egypt and thus is not specifc to Xianity) all the terminology in the article itself I have used is adopted by contemporary Western philosophy and therefore is not specific to Xianity.
True, yoo might say, the introductory paragraph is an allsuion to the myth of Eden but I believe the allegory speaks for itself.
"I am my brother's keeper" is a referance to the Book of Ezekiel! Old Testament! Jewish, not Xian!
Free Will leading to evil? What was it I just said about the myth of Eden? Re-read (if yoo in fact read it the first time) my definition of Free Will.
And of course, where did I ever say anything about seeing over other people's lives?
What amazes mee is that I have repeatedly stated that I am NOT opposed to Free Will and yoo seem to read straight past it and contine to argue with mee. The article was not even on the subject of Free Will anyway.
Here's the best part: "You dont give me the benefit of the doubt, offer to help, ask why, or try to distract me from this task that you judge to be wrong," Try to distract yoo? Which is interfering more with yor choice?
Honestly and respectfully, yor objection to the article is laughable, an article yoo clearly have no comprehension of. Are yoo offended by what yoo consider to be blashphemous or are yoo just being difficult? Yoo certainly seem to be making time to argue when yoo claim to have so many better things yoo could be doing?
|
|
|