|
|
Re: Legalbabble
by gothvail (vail@gothicamateur.com)
on Feb 27, 2002 - 06:40 AM
(User info | Send a Message)
http://www.gothicamateur.com
|
Just to be clear, the picture of me that was stolen came from Goth Babe of the Week, which is NOT an age-restricted site. The site GBOTW got the picture from was my BloodDoll.com site, which is also not age restricted. But the original location of the photo was actually my naughty website GothicAmateur.com. Makes me nervous thinking that underaged kids are going there. Just reassuring myself, really.
|
Re: Legalbabble
by Arthegarn on Feb 27, 2002 - 06:56 AM
(User info | Send a Message)
|
Ah, but that's another story that will be told another time. Anyway, you're right about Devin having to be careful not to distribute pornography to underages.
Now, what I am really shocked at is that you can not posess erotic material with BDSM flair until you are 21, and that you do not reach full majority until 25 (actually, If I recall correctly, you can't be President until you are 40, and considering that passive suffrage is a basic civil right that means you get full majority at 40, huh?). So... that means you can have sex, but you can't see others having sex? Or is there a law that forbids 19-year old people from practising light SM (Vail, for instance, was not certainly whipped nor tied in her pic, just had a slight and very erotic insinuation of it) in the privacy of their own bedrooms? What sort of ridiculous nonsense is that?
My, my, my... I had read that sodomy and oral sex were still crimes in some states, but never thought any government actually took that seriously.
|
|
|