|
|
Re: Legalbabble
by Shade on Feb 27, 2002 - 01:52 AM
(User info | Send a Message)
http://www.hotelshade.com
|
So I was right and wrong, Arthegarn, I am always impressed by the way you make the legalese at least partially understandable. Either way the Fakecakes screwed up royally
|
Re: Legalbabble
by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com)
on Feb 27, 2002 - 02:06 AM
(User info | Send a Message)
http://www.plynlymon.com
|
actually there is a secondary issue. The people that posts the pictures may not (in the case of gothvail's pic definatly were not) old enough to view, possess, or distribute those pics.
It is against the criminal code for people under 18 years of age to have ANYTHING to do with erotica (includung the written word, but that gets broken the most).
It is also illegal for anyone under the age of 21 to view, possess, or distribute any erotica with a BDSM* flair. well illegal in most states. there are 3 states to my knowlege that allow people over 18 to consume, in any fashion, BDSM erotica and gothvails pic would could as BDSM erotica.
For Devin to allow that picture to remain on his site would have been condoning underage lawbreaking. There is a criminal charge assosicated with that, as well as many civil code charges.
We dont reach our full majority in America until the age of 25, so at the age of 18 our lives are not yet our own.
I am not a lawyer, but i do have some experience with the criminal code (i was a teenager) and the civil code ( I am an adult) and for that matter some passing knowlege about commercial and corporate law as well ( i own a small corporation)
I know just enough to be a danger to myself and others.
*email me if you want that translated giggle.
|
|
|