Sticupus
Fanatic   Posts: 254 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 20/12/2003 at 06:38 PM |
Then go nail yourself inside a coffin.  ____________________
The OBOLISK is Divine.
|
| |
LadyCygnet
Fanatic  Posts: 287 Registered: 31/10/2003 Status: Offline
|
posted on 20/12/2003 at 11:37 PM |
I would, but then I wouldn't be able to read "Evil Homesexual agenda!" 
Anyway, I still believe that other people and the government don't need to
be poking their noses in a person's sexuality...unless a person happens to
be into that... :p ____________________
"To Live is to Annoy." -- Rev. Lambert Reilly, Archabbot, St. Meinrad Abbey
|
| |
Domkitten
Fanatic  Posts: 470 Registered: 23/9/2002 Status: Offline
|
posted on 20/12/2003 at 11:52 PM |
Oh man, nothing gets me off more than goverment policy, I mean, reading the
homeland security act is like liquid orgasm if you ask me.
But seriously, of course homosexuals have an agenda, we want to be better
than everyone else, you hadn't heard? ____________________
It's like kegel exercises for your throat.~Monolycus
|
| |
LadyCygnet
Fanatic Posts: 287 Registered: 31/10/2003 Status: Offline
|
posted on 21/12/2003 at 12:01 AM |
It's funny how the Patriot Act can let the government know everything, down
to how many darvocets your grandmother takes a month, but HIPAA won't let
the nurses tell you how she's doing if you call to ask how she is. Damn
moronic government.
But I digress.
If homosexuals have an agenda, can bisexual, artfag, voluptuous bitches
like myself have an agenda?
If so, can mine be purple?
____________________
"To Live is to Annoy." -- Rev. Lambert Reilly, Archabbot, St. Meinrad Abbey
|
| |
callei
Extreme Fanatic   Posts: 759 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 21/12/2003 at 06:18 AM |
Agenda:
2. A church service; a ritual or liturgy. [In this sense, usually
Agenda.]
Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.
This is why I find the idea of a Homosexual Agenda so funny. Even when they
are trying to talk about the world outside thier church, they use church
terms.
The last agenda I say included such things as rewards, bagels, question
period, and Bob's turn to talk. So even tho the latin definition of the
word is something closer to "contract" or "promise" and that todays use of
the word means "list of things to talk about while eating donuts" or "semi
organized grouping of vague ideas about things to do", the fact that it is
also used to denote "list of things a person at a pulpit is going to say"
makes it screamingly funny to me that anyone would use it to talk about a
concrete political program.
I guess they are using "semi organized grouping of vague ideas about things
to do" as part of a "list of things a person at a pulpit is going to say",
or "a list of semi organized, if unrelated, grouping of ideas that someone
at a pulpit is going to talk about". Or to put it more plainly, this is
HIS homosexual Agenda. Chances are good that he also has an Easter Agenda,
a rainy November Agenda, and a "kids are good" Agenda.
So, yes there is a homosexual Agenda, lots of them actually from all sorts
of people in backwards collars, but that doesnt impy or suggest that there
is a Homosexual agenda.
____________________
Real goths wear silver and crosses to keep the werewolves and vampires
away.
|
| |
feralucce
Extreme Fanatic  Posts: 1810 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 25/12/2003 at 11:11 PM |
well... I have had a realisation...
If these people are so against the evil homosexuals... Then why are the
churches employing them as priests?
Feral ____________________
The earth turns on a tilted axis - just doing the best it can.
Hohenheim of Light~Full Metal Alchemist
|
| |
Sticupus
Fanatic Posts: 254 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 26/12/2003 at 12:53 AM |
That's a common misconception. Homosexuals like hot man on man action. You
see them on TV on WWF. You can find them at football games, and your local
YMCA. (Other common misconceptions are that gay men are at places like
flower shops. Men don't go to flower shops.... except homosexuals do like
to work in retail for some reason or other.)
The churches like to hire pedophiles. And the pedophiles like to work at
chuches because there is an abundance of naive, shameful (ala
christianity), confused young boys who know how to keep a secret (thank the
puritans for blessing us with the power of shame and silence).
The homosexuals don't like children- because they are children... so smelly
and noisy: It gets in the way of going to the beach house in Fire Island,
affording the beach house in Fire Island, and all of the necessary tedious
prepwork needed for propper anal intercourse.
Cashmere and I have figured that the preists like children because they are
like women (but easier to manage). They are generally smaller, have higher
voices and are hairless like women, except they aren't because women don't
put up with this shit, and you don't need to put anything in their drink. ____________________
The OBOLISK is Divine.
|
| |
feralucce
Extreme Fanatic Posts: 1810 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 26/12/2003 at 12:50 PM |
ok... lemme modify yor response... homosexual pedaphiles... and not many
pro wrestlers are gay.... it is the amateur ones that are...
____________________
The earth turns on a tilted axis - just doing the best it can.
Hohenheim of Light~Full Metal Alchemist
|
| |
Sticupus
Fanatic Posts: 254 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 26/12/2003 at 05:00 PM |
| (sigh) ____________________
The OBOLISK is Divine.
|
| |
callei
Extreme Fanatic Posts: 759 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 27/12/2003 at 06:49 AM |
I thought priests just liked anyone that they could bully, didnt know that
they cared what kind of dangly bits those people had. And since most
churches dont allow thier little girls anywhere near the priests, all the
priests can get to are the alter boys. poor guys.
Stic, am i right that you were trying to make the point that there are gay
men in many and various jobs? that they arent all priests or flower shop
owners? That some gay men are big and tough and play dangerous sports?
Ps the most common "reason" cited by the bad priests for what they did to
thier alter boys is that it was done to them and they never got over it. So
like other forms of child abuse the abused goes on to abuse others and the,
for lack of a better word, spiritual virus keeps getting passed on. I have
often wonderd if the churches knew these priests had gone through such a
thing and that, in an attempt to help them get over it, accepted them into
the priesthood. Is it a good deed gone astray?
and on that note, should those that have been molested be allowed to be
around kids ever? stepping away from the priest issues alone here, should
people who were molested as kids be allowed to grow up to be teachers, day
care workers, or parents?
____________________
Real goths wear silver and crosses to keep the werewolves and vampires
away.
|
| |
The_Truth
Coward   Posts: 10 Registered: 17/3/2004 Status: Offline
|
posted on 1/4/2004 at 11:28 PM |
Gay marriage, the pros and cons.
Pro: Homos are not oppressed.
Cons: Their adopted children are going to have shit lives.
Solution: They can get married and adopt if they want, but every homosexual
couple who gets married decides not to adopt, or adopts a child not of
their own gender.
Problems with solution: A few gay couples will adopt children so that they
can molest them and children who's parents are gay are bound to get bullied
especially if their parents are the same gender as they are.
Solution to problems of solution: Social services find a way to prevent
people from being bullied because their parents are gays other than kindly
asking peolpe not to be mean, which doesn;t work (tolerance). They are not
allowed to enfore their ideas by law.
bureacracy!
|
| |
feralucce
Extreme Fanatic Posts: 1810 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 2/4/2004 at 12:22 AM |
| shit lives? not really ____________________
The earth turns on a tilted axis - just doing the best it can.
Hohenheim of Light~Full Metal Alchemist
|
| |
callei
Extreme Fanatic Posts: 759 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 2/4/2004 at 06:41 AM |
Pro: An argument or consideration in favor of something: weighing the pros
and cons.
Con: In opposition or disagreement; against: debated the issue pro and
con.
Homosexuals can and do adopt without being "married". The concern is the
custody of the children if the legal parent were to die or leave. Its
almost the same issues as step-parents have, well those step parents that
raise the child as thier own. They also have children thru other means;
medical insemination and surrogate motherhood are often used. And many of
them have children from a previous relationship (altho this is way more
common with women than men, there are still a significant number of
homosexual males that can and do manage to have intercourse with a woman at
least once.)
the solution offered, that homosexual couples only have children of
opposite/different sex than the parents is bizarre. You are suggesting that
men raise girls even tho they dont know about periods, training bras, or
prom dresses. You are suggesting that women raise boys even tho they dont
about peeing standing up, random erections, or face shaving.
I mention these silly examples because they are mentioned in all the
arguements about why a child, regardless of gender or sex, needs to be
raised by both males and females to get a balanced world view. You hear it
mostly about all the single mothers out there raising thier sons, but it is
the same arguement for single fathers and for same sex couples.
And as sad as this sounds, most kids get bullied at one point or another.
It has nothing to do with the kid that is getting bullied, but rather will
the bully and the abuse that they are getting at home. that, i think, is
where the attention would be better spent, on the bullies themselves and
getting them out of abusive homes, away from the abusive parent(s) and into
some kind of loving environment with therapy.
As of yet, there has been no documented case of a gay couple adopting or
trying to adopt a child to molest it. but there is a limited data set on
step parents in homosexual relationships so there is a chance that the same
step parent problem would exist for homosexual parents as it does for
hetersexual parents. (step parents being the more likely to molest than a
birth parent).
____________________
Real goths wear silver and crosses to keep the werewolves and
vampires
/>
away.
|
| |
Squire-of-Gothos
Fanatic  Posts: 206 Registered: 1/1/2003 Status: Offline
|
posted on 2/4/2004 at 07:01 AM |
Yeah, uumm, ediot? I have a friend who took major shit for having a lesbian
couple as care givers, and I have one never got any, and everyone loves
them. Answer: First friend's mothers are assholes and don't let him do
anything, second friend's mothers are cool. Possible other conclusion for
getting crap about having gay couple for parents: Child in homosexual
family goes to school with assholes and firebrand religious ass buckets.
And by the way, these AFA people are hilarious, ("Gay" activists target
America's children and seek their help in quest of "tolerance" and
"acceptance" ) Thats comedy gold! Talking about tolerance and aceptance as
if it were bad? Genius! My parents are straight, and I got made fun of all
the time. Maybe it was because I was skinny, or pale, or I talked a lot, or
becuase I was far, far cooler than them. But it happens. And being beaten
with sticks and rocks, and being called a "faggot" and "loser" and "bitch"
and "Weak" is just as bad as being beaten with rocks and sticks and having
people chant that your mothers eat pussy. In fatc, I heard the same thing,
even though I was in the aformentioned straight family. It doesn't matter.
Douche bag is douche bag. Hell you could even say that black people
shouldn't be allowed to mae becuase they're offspring will get hurt by
racist remarks. Bleh.....
____________________
“The only thing that can alter the good writer is death.”
“You know that if I were reincarnated, I’d want to come back a buzzard.
Nothing hates him. He is never bothered or in danger, and he can eat
anything.”
Faulkner
|
| |
Ironboots
Extreme Fanatic  Posts: 893 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 2/4/2004 at 09:46 AM |
"or becuase I was far, far cooler than them."
heh, that's the way to think... ____________________
Piggy's got the Conch!
|
| |
The_Truth
Coward Posts: 10 Registered: 17/3/2004 Status: Offline
|
posted on 6/4/2004 at 02:51 PM |
"the solution offered, that homosexual couples only have children of
opposite/different sex than the parents is bizarre. You are suggesting that
men raise girls even tho they dont know about periods, training bras, or
prom dresses. You are suggesting that women raise boys even tho they dont
about peeing standing up, random erections, or face shaving."
Who are you to say that men should not adopt girls and women should not
adopt boys, or that single mothers and fathers should not be allowed to
raise their sons and daughters respectively? You hardcore
marxist-khmer-rouge-maoist-let's-starve-everyone-to-death-and-persecute-peo
ple-who-are-not-on-benefitsist you.
I find it hard to see how a family with 2 sons should have to endure being
torn apart by your totalitarianist government after their father has just
been killed in a car crash, only to be adopted by a gay male couple
resonates with your mentality, but I guess if anyone you 'think' is a
capitalist says something, you must disagree.
By the way, no matter how many times Stalin said 2+2=5 or war is peace, it
doesn't make it correct. I suggest you agree that totalitarianism is wrong
and that you prefer freedom to benefits.
|
| |
Merry_Widow
Fanatic  Posts: 598 Registered: 24/8/2002 Status: Offline
|
posted on 6/4/2004 at 02:59 PM |
No, that's not what she was saying. What she was saying, if you'll read
correctly, is that the solution you offered was limited. Restricted
adoption on the basis of gender is moronic. It doesn't solve anything.
Read carefully and answer thoughtfully, and maybe you won't sound like such
an ass. ____________________
Okay, dazzle me.
|
| |
The_Truth
Coward Posts: 10 Registered: 17/3/2004 Status: Offline
|
posted on 7/4/2004 at 12:32 PM |
I'M RIGHT!!
YOU CAN'T STOP ME
|
| |
Ironboots
Extreme Fanatic Posts: 893 Registered: 31/12/1969 Status: Offline
|
posted on 8/4/2004 at 12:48 PM |
Why is it that fascism keeps coming up in the forums even though Abbadon
didn't post here?  ____________________
Piggy's got the Conch!
|
| |
