|
|
Currently no members online:)
You are an anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here |
We have 35 guests online !
|
|
|
|
|
Articles: sex |
Posted by
callei on Sunday, January 27, 2002 - 02:03 PM PST
News flash to the unaware out there....
this site will not get you laid*
It doesnt make you more attractive to others to post bad poetry.
It doesnt make you more desirable to use cap locks or ignore punctuation.
It doesnt fix that make up problem that you have.
It will give you a new set of people to tease and ridicule and maybe some new insults when you need them
It will give you a sense of the absurd and foolish when you need it most.
This is brain candy not eye candy, despite all the wonderful pictures that we all send in.
Back to the sex part. Since I seem to be on a rant today about sex anyways I thought I would flesh (hehe) out the idea a bit more.
Most of the resent submissions that i have read (yes i have skipped over a few, but who doesnt) are about the lack of sex in thier lives.
maybe they dont say that out right, but it is true none the less.
Take that metaphysical unified theory for example. If you were well laid and wobbly in the knees you wouldnt have the brain power to ask those questions. You would be asking things like "why are the wrappers of condoms so hard to open?" and "where are the clean sheets?" and " What's you name again?".
You wouldnt be trying to vicariously have sex through the intermingling of all of space-time. you wouldn't be wondering about overlaping realities because you would KNOW that realities overlap (and over couch and in the shower and ....)
The bible school one is too easy. Plus i wrote it all out as a comment there already.
The poser rant may seem a bit more obstruse to you, but believe me that is all about sex too.
We dont care what the sexy person is wearing or saying, we just want them. When they shun us, we get our feelings hurt and we lash out. And we call them posers. The whole idea behind labels is to seperate the world into those that you can (socially acceptably) have sex with and those that you cant (socially acceptably) have sex with today. Posers are the ones that you wouldnt sleep today. Ubers are the ones that you REALLY want to sleep with today.
The whole onesy arguement... well we are talking about, at its root, two women who both slept with the same guy and the issues (no pun intended) that arose and keep arising around that sex. Clear enough there huh? One feels that they have something in common because they have shared sperm. One feels that the other should shove her head up her backside.
These two women are having these issues because of sex and the games that we play with sex and the natural biological results of having sex. Its allllll about sex.
The primal scream? that is just backed up lust orgasming from the throat instead of the more usual orificies.
Colombine shootings? Kids with waaay to little sex on thier hands (eww). If they had been getting some, would they really have had time to plan the attack?
The jihad against America... (take this as the humourous and terribly lopsides view that it is), They are just pissed because they think we get laid more often over here. The saddest part is that they are wrong.
Lack of sex is the biggest contributor to anger and stoopidity. Why be macho and try to show off for the preety girls if you are still limp from the aerobics of the night before? Why flirt with a guy in uniform ( known as young dumb and full of energy) if you are still dehydrated from the sweat-fest of the morning? There goes the backbone of any war effort.
* except for Devin. This is his site after all and it is therefor an effective and useful tool for screening and developing bedmates. The rest of us have to get our own
|
Note: had to happen someday right? |
| |
|
|
Average Rating : 5.0
Total ratings : 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
sex | Login/Create an account | 35 Comments |
| Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
Re: sex
by bettie_x (strangersangel@hotmail.com)
on Jan 27, 2002 - 09:43 PM
(User info | Send a Message)
http://bettie_x.tripod.com/strangeasangels/
|
*snort*
I"m not laughing at you, I'm lauging at some the the paradigms....
Couldn't have said it better, nobody could have!
Being well laid myself (hallelulha for husbands!)
things like that never occured to me *snicker*
caution: lack of (good) sex causes acne and mass murder....I think you're on to something.
Good job, well said, keep up the good (well laid) fight, C.
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com) on Jan 29, 2002 - 12:48 PM (User info | Send a Message) http://www.plynlymon.com | last time my sweety hubby tried it i was having bad cramps and didnt handle the transition from painful sleep to painful awakeness well.
I screamed something like just kill me know or something.
He was really upset.
we laughed about it the next day, but i dont think he'll be trying it again for awhile...
I feel kinda bad about that. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by Devin (devin-at-vibechild-dot-com) on Jan 29, 2002 - 01:47 PM (User info | Send a Message) http://devin.vibechild.com/ | Why do you girls gotta have such yummy phermoans right before you bleed? Don't you know we're gonna wanna molest you and you're gonna have cramps? Couldn't you change the timing a little? It would be so much more convenient for all involved. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex
by whitedove (jaroddove@doveworksentertainment.com)
on Jan 28, 2002 - 10:32 AM
(User info | Send a Message)
|
We are a very sex driven society all together. Actually I would go as far as to say we are a sexually driven race. Being that we get so much pleasure from sex, it is something we desire - it becomes our fun - it becomes our stress relief - it becomes our after dinner snack (okay, that might sound pretty crude - but it is just a saying). Those who don't get it as often or the way they like are more prone to anger. There is a lot to support Callei's words throughout history. The average person thinks of sex at least 3 times a day (this includes sexual activities as well - including, but not limited to: kissing, touching, rubbing, holding, licking, etc.).
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by whitedove (jaroddove@doveworksentertainment.com) on Jan 28, 2002 - 11:21 AM (User info | Send a Message) | Yeah, just 3 - I guess they are figuring in old people and children who may have 0 and it brings down the average... I know mine is maybe averaged at about 3 times per half hour or so...
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com) on Jan 28, 2002 - 07:16 PM (User info | Send a Message) http://www.plynlymon.com | actually the parts of the brain that "show" sexual/tactile/animal reaction lights up about every 10 minutes day or night when there is nothing very sexy going on.
as a teen, during the 72 hours around ovulation, or when shown something sexy it stays lit up.
this means in lay (hehe) man terms that we spend most of our time thinging about sex on some level. MOST of our time.
if you want to think of it as three times, well those would be moring noon and night i guess.
so if you find that you often watch the way that other people move, stop to feel the wind on your skin, chew your food, spend an extra second in the shower, or daydream, then you lighting up that part of the brain that is connected to sexual function.
At our most basic level we are here to eat, sleep, fuck, and die. that is the nature of life. society tries to make all sorts of rules around these basic needs to control behaviors of the herd. these are the only ways to control the herd, at its most primal level.
therefore we have eating disorders, sleeping disorders, sexual disorders, and are afraid of death. gotta love people control....
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by whitedove (jaroddove@doveworksentertainment.com) on Jan 29, 2002 - 09:52 AM (User info | Send a Message) | The 3 thoughts a day are directed towards the concept of what society views sex as. Though parts of our brain are shared it doesn't mean that everything is based so much on sex, because you can say that sex is based on one of the other things that part of the brain shares. As for arousal, it comes with certain sexual feelings, thoughts, actions, reactions, and certain stimulation. You are right, the part of the brain that controls stimulation is the same part that shares our sexual desire (thus, the wind blowing may trick our bodies into being aroused, even without sexual thought).
We are a sexually driven race, but many things are not so much based on the amount of sex one receives or lack of sex one gets. I think it can be taken on a person to person basis.
Everything that we do is not connected to a sexual functions, in the terms of what society deams "sexual." You could go as far as to say that when we go to the bathroom it is a sexual function because our genital areas are involved; but in fact it is more of a primitive function of survival not based on whether we have sexual desire or not. If you were living on a machine your body would have functions that are above more than a fixation on sex. Sex is our mindset now - it doesn't determine anything more than we let it. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com) on Jan 29, 2002 - 12:45 PM (User info | Send a Message) http://www.plynlymon.com | actually Dr. ruth says that most people think about sex (the desire to get in someone else's pants and do wonderful things) about 1 once an hour, if there is no actual stimulation of a sexual nature.
Most Dr.s agree that this is the normal rate of arousal.
getting a sexy thrill from the wind blowing on your body is not a trick. this is sexual stimulation at a more basic nature. It is not a trick, it is senual stimulation of the nerve endings and erogenous zones of the brain. this is real sex, not fake sex. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by whitedove (jaroddove@doveworksentertainment.com) on Jan 29, 2002 - 01:29 PM (User info | Send a Message) | I think Doctor Ruth said that is normal with a healthy sex life - the once per hour thing.
The nerve ending stimulation can be 'real' sex if that is your mindset of what you feel sex is. If you are bothered by the awkward feeling of becoming erect (or wet) by the wind it does not constitute sex (at least the definition of what sex is). Now, I believe that people are free to believe what they want and I encourage people to seek their own definitions to things - if you do believe that all things in the human mind revolve around sex, I have no right to say you are wrong. Though I don't agree. Getting a flu shot is stimulation of the nerves, based on a usually painful reaction of the body - both pain and pleasure draw from the same part of the brain, but I know that most people who gets shots are not sexually aroused by them. The stimulation of the nerves does not constitute as 'real' sex (again, unless that is what you personally feel 'real' sex is). The sensation you speak of may be confused with 'Feel' instead of 'Sex'.
Main Entry: 1feel
Pronunciation: 'fE(&)l
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): felt /'felt/; feel·ing
Etymology: Middle English felen, from Old English fElan; akin to Old High German fuolen to feel, Latin palpare to caress
Date: before 12th century
transitive senses
1 a : to handle or touch in order to examine, test, or explore some quality b : to perceive by a physical sensation coming from discrete end organs (as of the skin or muscles)
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com) on Jan 29, 2002 - 08:56 PM (User info | Send a Message) http://www.plynlymon.com | does your definition of sex include kissing? hugging? masageing? or does it only include penatration?
my definition of sex is perhaps broader than yours, i agree. But then I dont "believe" in fornication or original sin either.
I agree that very pleasureable sensations often give rise (giggle) to sexual responses EVEN when those sensations are not imediatly sexual. eg a really yummy sundae, or a warm shower. But the fact that these stimulations do elicit a "sexual" response means that they are somehow intertwined with our natural sex drive.
I am not saying that your definition is wrong or anything silly like that, I am saying that there is more to sex than male-female penatration. sex starts long before (sometimes) any of the involved parties are actually physically aroused. SOMETHING has to get them aroused, in the mood, and willing to play with the other person(s)
I am not redefining the word sex, I am using the scientific working definition of sexual response.
And when you try to tell your mind that it cant have sexual feelings about things that it does already have sexual feelings about, you set up the foundation of sexual disfunction. This is why so many men and women in western culture are damamged and unhappy. they have been taught to lie to themselves and to others and are trapped between what thier body knows and what society says they ought to think or feel.
is it wrong to admit that you are hungery when your stomach growls? no. so why is it wrong to admit that you feel yummy when you get wet/hard/mentally stimulated?
If you go with the idea that sex is purely for procration, they why do we get to have orgasms? there is no reason for the female orgasm under that belief structure. especially not multiple orgasms.
If your believe structure says that sex is only for procration, more power to you. Im not knocking it. its your life.
Just, please be kind to yourself and your lover(s) and remember that someone once told you it was OK to be aroused and that arousal is not a bad thing and that arousal doesnt have to interfere with anything else that you are doing. Its OK to be human once in awhile. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by whitedove (jaroddove@doveworksentertainment.com) on Jan 30, 2002 - 06:30 AM (User info | Send a Message) | I think of sex as a lot more than "penetration" and even the definition of sex follows close to what you believe it is:
Main Entry: 1sex
Pronunciation: 'seks
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin sexus
Date: 14th century
1 : either of the two major forms of individuals that occur in many species and that are distinguished respectively as female or male
2 : the sum of the structural, functional, and behavioral characteristics of living things that are involved in reproduction by two interacting parents and that distinguish males and females
3 a : sexually motivated phenomena or behavior b : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE
I agree that sometimes taking a shower (especially with someone) is very erotic and a very sexual nature. I also believe that things that put us in the mood for sexual activity can be considered of a sexual nature. What I disagreed with was that 'everything' revolves around sex. There are a lot of things involved in - or at least that 'can be' involved in sex.
You hit the nail on the head though when you said that pleasureable sensations often give rise (giggle) to sexual responses EVEN when those sensations are not imediatly sexual. Some people are extremely aroused by watching other people do certain activities (IE. playing music, washing a car, eating a sucker), the arousal is there even if the activity is a 'sexual' activity. But there are things that happen, are seen and felt, that do not trigger sexual responses.
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com) on Jan 30, 2002 - 03:31 PM (User info | Send a Message) http://www.plynlymon.com | not directly related to sex, yes. but indirectly related to sex? its like kevin bacon, EVERYTHING can be related to sex, every social movement every work of art, every bit of homework, every load of laundry.
Thoughts and actions that are focused on status are indirectly related to sex in that with more status, you get more sex. thoughts that are artistic are related to sex in that the act of creating art is very sensual and is a way of reproducing your self (fake sex if you will). Acts of violence are often sparked from a sense of low status or to improve ones status... so that one can have more sex.
laying in bed daydreaming about how planets are made is also indirectly related to sex in a variety of ways. this is the down time, the post orgasmic lull in acticity after the mad sexuality of the day. It is also the time when one defines what type of status one needs to get more sex. It is often refured to as mental masterbation.
anyhoo. Like i said, anything can be and is related to sex if you try hard enough. giggle. and biologically we are driven by sex till our ovaries give out. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by whitedove (jaroddove@doveworksentertainment.com) on Jan 31, 2002 - 06:53 AM (User info | Send a Message) | Oh of course you can relate virtually anything to 'sex' if you use Psychoanalytic Reasoning. You can also relate everything to a basic instinct of some sorts. Using the right thoughts you can link everything to everything - that has been proven and is without debate.
We could link actions to the desire to eat. Or that basis that all things revolve around entertainment. Your theory on everything relating to sex is something people will have to see in their own heads. It is neither right or wrong. Sex is one of the best perks to being human, that is for sure. ;)
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by Devin (devin-at-vibechild-dot-com) on Jan 31, 2002 - 07:49 AM (User info | Send a Message) http://devin.vibechild.com/ | Oh -- ------ --- --- ------ virtual-- -------- -- 'sex' -- --- use ------------- ---------. You --- ---- ------ ---------- -- - basic instinct -- ---- -----. ----- --- ----- thoughts --- --- link everything to everything - ---- --- ---- ------ --- -- ------- ------.
We could ---- action- -- --- desire -- eat. -- ---- ----- ---- --- things ------- ------ entertainment. ---- ------ -- ---------- -------- -- sex -- --------- people ---- ---- -- see -- ----- --- head-. -- -- ------- ----- -- -----. Sex -- --- -- --- ---- perk- -- ----- -----, ---- -- --- sure. ;) |
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by whitedove (jaroddove@doveworksentertainment.com) on Jan 31, 2002 - 11:26 AM (User info | Send a Message) | I like the "people see head - sex perk" part :P
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex by whitedove (jaroddove@doveworksentertainment.com) on Jan 29, 2002 - 09:54 AM (User info | Send a Message) | Nameless people who write books on sexuality. People like Doctor Ruth and what not. Self proclaimed sex specialists. My opinions are not based on theirs - it is just what society has accepted (yeah, that doesn't fit the stereotype).
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex
by chameleon on Jan 28, 2002 - 01:49 PM
(User info | Send a Message)
|
DAmmit, this makes me think too hard! I thought that becasue it was sex, it would be easy to understand. *slaps self in face* It does make me curious though, as to where you got your information and such. As a parting note, I admit it openly, I need more sex, period.
|
Re: sex by Ianthe99 on Jan 28, 2002 - 04:07 PM (User info | Send a Message) | I was kinda wondering about the three times a day average too. I guess I just have waaaaaayyyy too much time to daydream. :o |
[ No anonymous comments ]
"sex taught me about the universe!"
by Alugarde on Jan 29, 2002 - 06:02 PM
(User info | Send a Message)
|
Ok, I agree with you on the bible school thing. But my theory? Granted I'm no master theorist, but you basically just said that everything everyone knows about the universe is due to a lack of sex. Reaching a bit there?
|
Re: by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com) on Jan 29, 2002 - 09:22 PM (User info | Send a Message) http://www.plynlymon.com | "everything everyone knows about the universe is due to a lack of sex"
Meaning that if Einstein had had a sexual dysfunction then he would have finished his theories? But because he had a very active sex life he didn't?
No what I mean is that for most of our lives, we are driven by the hormonal changes that take place in our brains. much of that chemestry is focused on getting laid and eating food.
Ceasar rarely went to bed alone. Atila had many partners. Ghandi happily married and very clear that sex was important to the sability of the mind and heart. Vogue magaazines says it all the time.
Sexual response is like breathing. If you dont get enough oxygen you get silly, if you try to stiffle sexual response you get silly too.
but that is just my opinion, i could be wrong |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: by Alugarde on Jan 30, 2002 - 05:58 PM (User info | Send a Message) | I never said I disagreed with any of that. What I disagree with is that you seem to think everything is due to a lack of sex. There ARE some things, such as my theory, that came from interest in the subject. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com) on Jan 31, 2002 - 03:38 AM (User info | Send a Message) http://www.plynlymon.com | and you have time to think about this theory in the post-orgasm parts of the day; when your body is tired, there is no parade of desireable flesh in front of you, when there is no (ok or little) senual stimulation.
This type of thought, the not-totally-focused-on-sex kind of thought, is similar in many respects to the kinds of thought that one has after orgasm that is why i am calling it post orgasmic thought.
My theory allows for your ideas, too bad your doesnt allow for mine.
--- and yes I am feeling snarky here, this was a joke in the first place (sorta) and to have to defend satire is really tiresome.
Also I have been awake for 20 hours and have had 21 hours of sleep in the past 5 days.
Im starting to talk to the pink elephants, not just see them. |
[ No anonymous comments ]
Re: sex
by Schizo on Feb 01, 2002 - 07:14 PM
(User info | Send a Message)
|
Really, I thought my onesie situation stemmed from a presence, rather than an absence of sex. But I suppose my presence of sex stemmed from a 24-year-long absence of that illustrious activity, so, since we're in the business of making indirect associations, you are right after all!
Hooray for Callei!
|
Re: sex by callei (plyn@plynlymon.com) on Feb 02, 2002 - 01:56 AM (User info | Send a Message) http://www.plynlymon.com | your impending bundle of sleepless nights and diaper bags comes from sex, the bitchfest and crap is from lack of sex( on the bitch's part, because she cant get the fulfilment out of it that real people do and on your part, cause if you were wobbly kneed you wouldnt care as much and would yawn in her face!)
|
[ No anonymous comments ]
[ No anonymous comments ]
|
|